Shore and Cockburn are respected thought leaders in the agile community going back at least a decade.
In a word: Cockburn sees value in certifications, with caveats to be sure, and Shore not only sees no value but actually believes certifications are counterproductive to their aim.
I was a bit shocked to here Shore rip into the very idea of certifications, calling them immoral and utterly misleading, and damning all those that use them as filters. This on a PMI sponsored webinar!
To be fair, here's the summary points each gave at the end:
- Both agree that certification does not demonstrate or indicate competence and maybe not understanding
- Alistair Cockburn: a certificate:
is evidence of having gone down a pathway of education
permits or enables scale to be applied to examining large numbers of candidates, or a company, for a job
encourages individuals to re-up on latest techniques
should be valued according to a market value established by business and hiring officials
should be more granular, like associates and interns, etc so that the value proposition is more readily established
- James Shore: a certificate:
leads to institutional stagnation
creates institutional power structure that limits advancement
confuses competence and expertise with simple exposure to information
should not be a filter on considering a candidate for a job
should not substitute for due diligence, even at scale
And I'm with Shore when he points out that the industry that promotes "Scrum Master" certificates for $1500 and a two day sitting in a hotel room presentation is pretty much a joke on everyone except those collecting the money.
But I'm strongly with Cockburn on the value of forcing a re-up from time to time. Even Shore see merit in the education, just not in the certification of the education.
Bookmark this on Delicious
Are you on LinkedIn? Share this article with your network by clicking on the link.