Fidelity, faithfulness, and commitment often seem to be the tension between:
- What the customer/sponsor/user want, and
- What the project charter/scope calls for.
Why so? Why isn't it straightforward? The business case begets the project charter; the charter begets the project plan; and then the project team is off to do the deliverables. Simple, right?
Wrong!
It's never that simple -- though on paper that's the way it should be.
What is reality is a challenge between "fidelity to user expectation" and "fidelity to user specification".
Expectation v specification. How to manage this? First, it's should always be a decision and not just a consequence of wandering off track; and second:
- If you have the latitude to shift "loyalty" from specification to expectation, you are in what the community generally calls an "agile" environment.
- If the decision process takes into account expectation as well as specification, then both of these should be on the list of "inputs" to the decision. And,
- Indeed, there may be two decisions, one for each criteria, with the customer as the referee: does the customer want to honor the spec, or shift to expectation? (Does the customer have the latitude to make this decision?)
Check out these books I've written in the library at Square Peg Consulting