For years and years, PMs have been "little data" people. We plot data points, compute averages, look at 1-sigma, 2-sigma (and sometimes, 6-sigma) limits, ponder the Central Limit Theorem, and wonder about the law of large numbers
Fair enough
What then is "big data" if not simply more numbers, more data points?
Andrew Gelman -- eminent authority in the statistical analysis field -- has this pithy answer:
“Big Data” is more than a slogan; it is our modern world in which we learn by combining information from diverse sources of varying quality."
And, so what is it we do when the data quality varies?
- Get more, to see if there is a discernible and useful pattern
- Use Bayesian techniques to refine hypothesis based on observations and feedback
- Throw out the obviously bad stuff, though try not to throw it out just because it's an inconvenient counter-point
Not familiar with Bayes? Search this blog site; you'll find a lot of stuff here
Read in the library at Square Peg Consulting about these books I've written
Buy them at any online book retailer!
Read my contribution to the Flashblog