There comes a point where more planning can not remove the remaining uncertainty, instead execution must be used to provide data and remove uncertainty.
This quote comes from a nicely argued case -- from the agile blog 'leading answers' -- for mixing agile methods in rather traditional businesses, like the oil and gas exploration/production business
If ever there was a business that benefits from Boehm's Spiral Model, OGM (oil, gas, minerals) is certainly one. (Disclosure: I hold some OGM leases in Texas, so I've a bit of personal experience with this)
Agility needed?
So, what have we got here?
- A lot of risk acknowledged up front (can't know everything -- thus the opening quote)
- A need to run with pilot projects before committing to production
- A need to tie into legacy systems (in the OGM case, distribution systems)
- A lot of deliverables that can be done incrementally and then integrated
- Small (it's all relative re small) teams, co-located, personally committed, with risk hanging on every move.
- A degree of local autonomy required to meet the challenges of the moment
Of course, there's "one big thing":
You can't go around self-organizing (agile speak) willy-nilly! There's regulatory constraints everywhere and safety-first doctrine hanging on every move.
We're here to help!
So, yes, there is a big bureaucracy that watches over... it's certainly more intrusive than a coach or a servant-leader (more agile speak) I'm sure they never heard this stuff in an oil field or an offshore rig! In fact, I'll bet the rig boss is a force to be reckoned with!
Read in the library at Square Peg Consulting about these books I've written
Buy them at any online book retailer!
Read my contribution to the Flashblog
